Contents Index Search Related Documents Previous Next

12.5.1 Formal Private and Derived Types

The class determined for a formal private type can be either limited or nonlimited, and either tagged or untagged; no more specific class is known for such a type. The class determined for a formal derived type is the derivation class rooted at the ancestor type.

Syntax

formal_private_type_definition ::= [[abstract] tagged] [limited] private

3/2

formal_derived_type_definition ::=
[abstract] [limited] new subtype_mark [[and interface_list]with private]

Legality Rules

If a generic formal type declaration has a known_discriminant_part, then it shall not include a default_expression for a discriminant.

5/2

The ancestor subtype of a formal derived type is the subtype denoted by the subtype_mark of the formal_derived_type_definition. For a formal derived type declaration, the reserved words with private shall appear if and only if the ancestor type is a tagged type; in this case the formal derived type is a private extension of the ancestor type and the ancestor shall not be a class-wide type. Similarly, an interface_list or the optional reserved word abstract shall appear only if the ancestor type is a tagged type. Finally, the reserved word limited shall appear only if the ancestor type and any progenitor types are limited types.

5.1/2

The actual type for a generic formal derived type shall be a descendant of every progenitor of the formal type.

If the formal subtype is definite, then the actual subtype shall also be definite.

For a generic formal derived type with no discriminant_part:

If the ancestor subtype is constrained, the actual subtype shall be constrained, and shall be statically compatible with the ancestor;

If the ancestor subtype is an unconstrained access or composite subtype, the actual subtype shall be unconstrained.

If the ancestor subtype is an unconstrained discriminated subtype, then the actual shall have the same number of discriminants, and each discriminant of the actual shall correspond to a discriminant of the ancestor, in the sense of 3.7.

10.1/2

If the ancestor subtype is an access subtype, the actual subtype shall exclude null if and only if the ancestor subtype excludes null.

The declaration of a formal derived type shall not have a known_discriminant_part. For a generic formal private type with a known_discriminant_part:

The actual type shall be a type with the same number of discriminants.

The actual subtype shall be unconstrained.

The subtype of each discriminant of the actual type shall statically match the subtype of the corresponding discriminant of the formal type.

For a generic formal type with an unknown_discriminant_part, the actual may, but need not, have discriminants, and may be definite or indefinite.

Static Semantics

The class determined for a formal private type is as follows:

Type Definition  Determined Class

limited private  the class of all types
private  the class of all nonlimited types
tagged limited private  the class of all tagged types
tagged private  the class of all nonlimited tagged types

The presence of the reserved word abstract determines whether the actual type may be abstract.

A formal private or derived type is a private or derived type, respectively. A formal derived tagged type is a private extension. A formal private or derived type is abstract if the reserved word abstract appears in its declaration.

20/2

If the ancestor type is a composite type that is not an array type, the formal type inherits components from the ancestor type (including discriminants if a new discriminant_part is not specified), as for a derived type defined by a derived_type_definition (see 3.4 and 7.3.1).

21/2

For a formal derived type, the predefined operators and inherited user-defined subprograms are determined by the ancestor type and any progenitor types, and are implicitly declared at the earliest place, if any, immediately within the declarative region in which the formal type is declared, where the corresponding primitive subprogram of the ancestor or progenitor is visible (see 7.3.1). In an instance, the copy of such an implicit declaration declares a view of the corresponding primitive subprogram of the ancestor or progenitor of the formal derived type, even if this primitive has been overridden for the actual type. When the ancestor or progenitor of the formal derived type is itself a formal type, the copy of the implicit declaration declares a view of the corresponding copied operation of the ancestor or progenitor. In the case of a formal private extension, however, the tag of the formal type is that of the actual type, so if the tag in a call is statically determined to be that of the formal type, the body executed will be that corresponding to the actual type.

22/1

For a prefix S that denotes a formal indefinite subtype, the following attribute is defined:

S'Definite: S'Definite yields True if the actual subtype corresponding to S is definite; otherwise it yields False. The value of this attribute is of the predefined type Boolean.

Dynamic Semantics

23.1/2

In the case where a formal type is tagged with unknown discriminants, and the actual type is a class-wide type T'Class:

23.2/2

For the purposes of defining the primitive operations of the formal type, each of the primitive operations of the actual type is considered to be a subprogram (with an intrinsic calling convention — see 6.3.1) whose body consists of a dispatching call upon the corresponding operation of T, with its formal parameters as the actual parameters. If it is a function, the result of the dispatching call is returned.

23.3/2

If the corresponding operation of T has no controlling formal parameters, then the controlling tag value is determined by the context of the call, according to the rules for tag-indeterminate calls (see 3.9.2 and 5.2). In the case where the tag would be statically determined to be that of the formal type, the call raises Program_Error. If such a function is renamed, any call on the renaming raises Program_Error.

NOTES

9 In accordance with the general rule that the actual type shall belong to the class determined for the formal (see 12.5, “Formal Types”):

If the formal type is nonlimited, then so shall be the actual;

For a formal derived type, the actual shall be in the class rooted at the ancestor subtype.

10 The actual type can be abstract only if the formal type is abstract (see 3.9.3).

11 If the formal has a discriminant_part, the actual can be either definite or indefinite. Otherwise, the actual has to be definite.

Contents Index Search Related Documents Previous Next Legal